What scheduling changes could make a 5+11 model viable for Big Ten and SEC despite current scheduling disparities, and how would that impact fantasy value?
Making a 5+11 model viable would require unified cross-division scheduling that equalizes conference load and current non-conference risk. A feasible path is mutual agreement on a shared 10-game league slate with four conference games offset by guaranteed non-conference tests that preserve competitive integrity. For fantasy, this would stabilize volatility, elevating the predictability of players who rely on late-season durability and conference rivals with repeated encounters. The trick is aligning calendars so teams aren’t overtaxed, preserving both playoff positioning and player health.